Can Pressure Make Peace?

A new effort to widen sanctions on Sudan confronts the governments and networks that help make a distant war possible.

Two empty chairs facing one another beyond stacked unmarked crates in a dark warehouse
Visual essay · TDC original editorial artwork

Sudan’s war is fought inside Sudan. It is not sustained there alone.

At the United Nations this week, officials again described a conflict locked in a zero-sum military logic. Thirteen million people have fled their homes. The UN documented about 1,400 civilian deaths from January to June, including roughly 1,100 people killed by drone strikes.

The United States proposed expanding UN sanctions and the existing arms embargo beyond Darfur, arguing that financial, military and political support to both the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces continues to drive the war. Sudan’s army chief said sanctions would not deter his forces from fighting until RSF-held territory was captured.

Sanctions are not a sacrament. Poorly designed pressure can deepen civilian suffering, enrich smugglers and allow powerful states to perform concern without changing their own conduct.

But the weakness of one tool does not erase the responsibility of those supplying the machinery of war.

The hands sustaining a war are not clean because they are far from the blood.
Scripture

Jesus calls peacemakers blessed—not peace spectators, and not those who rename domination as order.

Matthew 5:9

Biblical peace is more than a pause between attacks. It is the ordering of life toward truth, justice and neighbourly flourishing. Peacemaking therefore asks who profits, who supplies, who protects an ally from consequence and who treats another country’s civilians as acceptable leverage.

Christ makes peace not by declaring violence unreal, but by bearing hostility and breaking its claim to rule. Christian judgment should likewise resist victory at any cost, whoever promises it.

The responsible question is not simply whether sanctions sound strong. It is whether pressure is targeted at decision-makers and supply networks, protects humanitarian access, is measured honestly and serves a credible path back to civilian life.

South Africans should ask what our diplomacy, trade and regional institutions reward. Peacemaking is not only an attitude toward Sudan; it is scrutiny of every relationship that can lengthen the war.

Sudan needs more than statements from afar. It needs those beyond the battlefield to stop confusing distance with innocence—and to withdraw the support that keeps peace negotiable but war profitable.

Reporting consulted

Read the record

  1. Sudan: USG DiCarlo calls for urgent international action as parties remain locked in ‘zero-sum military logic’United Nations Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs · 24 August 2026
  2. US urges new UN sanctions to spur rivals in Sudan to negotiate an end to warAssociated Press · 24 August 2026
  3. Drone strikes kill 8 civilians in Sudan’s North Kordofan, group saysAssociated Press · 29 August 2026

TDC links the reporting that established the public facts. The reflection and theological judgment are the author’s.

Illustrated portrait of Matthew Neal at his writing desk

About the author

Matthew Neal is a South African Christian writer and theology student based in Cape Town. He writes at the intersection of Scripture, culture, and contemporary life, asking the deeper questions beneath the issues shaping South Africa today. His work has appeared in The Gospel Coalition Africa and JOY! Magazine. He is the founder and editor of theDailyCovenant (TDC).

The TDC letter

Take the question with you.

Receive a short Christian reflection for the questions shaping life in South Africa.

Email delivery begins after an approved mailing provider is connected.

Read next →

Can an Election Be Democratic If the Courthouse Is Closed?

Leadership · 2 min read